Filter

The Societal Benefit of the EU Methane Regulation

The EU Methane Regulation, adopted in 2024, aims to reduce methane emissions from the production and supply of oil, natural gas and coal. Beyond introducing new requirements for monitoring and reducing emissions within the EU, it progressively extends these obligations to imported fossil fuels. This is particularly important as more than three quarters of the methane emissions associated with European fossil-fuel consumption occur outside the EU. As political pressure to delay or weaken the Regulation grows, a new DIW Econ study examines its potential societal benefits and the costs of implementation.

The findings show that the societal benefits of the Regulation could exceed its costs by a factor of 14. Under full and timely implementation, assuming an illustrative methane-intensity threshold of 0.2% for imports from 2030, around 80 million tonnes of methane emissions could be avoided cumulatively by 2050. The present value of the resulting global climate, health and economic benefits over the modelled period exceeds €700 billion, compared with regulatory costs of around €50 billion. The Regulation could prevent around 155,000 premature deaths worldwide over the modelled period. Delaying implementation by three years while introducing a weaker methane-intensity threshold would result in around €185 billion in foregone societal benefits.

For the analysis, DIW Econ reconstructed the methane emissions associated with European fossil-fuel consumption using international energy trade data and country-specific emission intensities. Different implementation scenarios were then assessed using an extended version of the GIVE integrated assessment model. The model quantifies avoided societal damages from temperature-related mortality, ozone-related respiratory mortality, agricultural losses, heat-related labour productivity losses, additional energy costs and sea-level rise. These benefits were compared with estimates of technical abatement and regulatory compliance costs.

The vending machine industry between regulation and economic trends since 1993 – Update 2025

In a recent study commissioned by VDAI Verlags- und Veranstaltungsgesellschaft mbH, DIW Econ evaluated how the scope for action in the gaming machine industry has developed over the last 30 years. Entitled ’40 Pfennig Höchsteinsatz – Die Automatenwirtschaft zwischen Regulierung und ökonomischen Trends seit 1993 – Update 2025′ (40 Pfennig Maximum Bet: The Vending Machine Industry between Regulation and Economic Trends since 1993 – Update 2025), the study describes the latest developments in the industry’s economic environment, including sharp rises in energy and personnel costs, as well as the renewed expansion of illegal gaming machines.

Urban development funding has a variety of effects

DIW Econ conducted a study on behalf of DIE STADTENTWICKLER based on data from SOEP and the INKAR database. The study examined living conditions in urban development areas and the impact of subsidies on the construction and renovation of housing.

Who benefits from the tax allowance for education, upbringing and training?

The current short expert report commissioned by the AWO Bundesverband e.V. sheds light on the distributional effects of the tax allowances for children. In particular, the allowance for care, education and training costs (BEA) currently favours high-income households more than low-income families. The study analyses how halving the CEA or reducing it to 300 euros would affect different groups of households.

The economic impact of e-lending in public libraries on the consumer book market

On behalf of the Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media (BKM), DIW Econ analysed the economic effects of e-lending on the German public book market. In its coalition agreement, the German government established the goal of creating a fair framework conditions for e-lending in public libraries. The study now presented by DIW Econ aims to provide a comprehensive empirical basis for this.